<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bonus: A Quick Look at Next-gen Image Formats (JPEG XL etc)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://mhloppy.com/2023/01/2022-pc-nas-upgrade-bonus-next-gen-image-formats-jpeg-xl-avif/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://mhloppy.com/2023/01/2022-pc-nas-upgrade-bonus-next-gen-image-formats-jpeg-xl-avif/</link>
	<description>Data-driven decision making is the only way to go</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 12:23:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MHLoppy		</title>
		<link>https://mhloppy.com/2023/01/2022-pc-nas-upgrade-bonus-next-gen-image-formats-jpeg-xl-avif/#comment-41851</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MHLoppy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 12:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mhloppy.com/?p=2534#comment-41851</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://mhloppy.com/2023/01/2022-pc-nas-upgrade-bonus-next-gen-image-formats-jpeg-xl-avif/#comment-41848&quot;&gt;lorenamer&lt;/a&gt;.

I imagine if there&#039;s a coordinated, sustained push by &quot;all&quot; of big tech, one of the next-gen formats might be able to make pretty good inroads if they&#039;re aggressive enough about it. I&#039;m not sure what it would take for them to do it though, particularly because even now some people oppose the use of WebP even though support for it has become pretty good; pushing a new format aggressively would annoy plenty of people who just want &quot;it&quot; to keep working as-is without having to worry if X program or service supports Y format.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://mhloppy.com/2023/01/2022-pc-nas-upgrade-bonus-next-gen-image-formats-jpeg-xl-avif/#comment-41848">lorenamer</a>.</p>
<p>I imagine if there&#8217;s a coordinated, sustained push by &#8220;all&#8221; of big tech, one of the next-gen formats might be able to make pretty good inroads if they&#8217;re aggressive enough about it. I&#8217;m not sure what it would take for them to do it though, particularly because even now some people oppose the use of WebP even though support for it has become pretty good; pushing a new format aggressively would annoy plenty of people who just want &#8220;it&#8221; to keep working as-is without having to worry if X program or service supports Y format.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: lorenamer		</title>
		<link>https://mhloppy.com/2023/01/2022-pc-nas-upgrade-bonus-next-gen-image-formats-jpeg-xl-avif/#comment-41848</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lorenamer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://mhloppy.com/?p=2534#comment-41848</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[30 years of JPEG is wild when you think about how much everything else has evolved in tech. I remember being surprised that JPEG 2000 never really took off despite being positioned as the successor—kind of confirms what you said about it not being a clear upgrade in practice. Makes me wonder what format will finally push JPEG into retirement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>30 years of JPEG is wild when you think about how much everything else has evolved in tech. I remember being surprised that JPEG 2000 never really took off despite being positioned as the successor—kind of confirms what you said about it not being a clear upgrade in practice. Makes me wonder what format will finally push JPEG into retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
